• Skip to Content
  • Skip to Main Navigation
  • Skip to Footer
  • Home Page
  • Subscribe
  • Sign in
  • Free Trial
  • Bulletins
  • Advertise
Windpower Monthly
Menu
  • Home
  • News
    Show
    • News
    • All news
    • Technology
    • Business & Finance
    • Markets & Policy
    • Offshore
    • Projects
    • Operations
    • Green Hydrogen
    • Grids & Transmission
  • Analysis
    Show
    • Analysis
    • Podcasts
    • Opinion
    • Features
    • Turbines of the Year
    • Latest Issue
  • Intelligence
    Show
    • Intelligence
    • Intelligence Home
    • Database
    • Benchmark
    • Insight
    • Companies
    • Countries
  • Markets
    Show
    • Markets
    • Tender Watch
    • Global regions
  • Manufacturers
  • Reports
  • Webinars
  • Events
  • All news
  • Technology
  • Business & Finance
  • Markets & Policy
  • Offshore
  • Projects
  • Operations
  • Green Hydrogen
  • Grids & Transmission

Promotional feature

Ingeteam

Ingeteam introduces new-generation power converters

Ingeteam’s market-leading converters are supported by a robust Firmware development methodology designed to simplify wind turbine converter validation and certification

4 May 2021

  • Share article on Twitter
  • Share article on Facebook
  • Share article on LinkedIn

As more wind energy is connected to the grid, ensuring the correct electrical performance of the wind turbine is critical to maximising production and also for ensuring the safe operation of the grid. The power converter is the active component connecting the turbine to the grid. As the interface between the two, the power converter is designed to function to meet the needs of the generator side and the grid side. 

Following power converter installation, unwanted firmware behaviour can have serious consequences, from impact on production, leading to reduced revenues, to non-fulfilment of grid code requirements. It can even lead to damage to other turbine components, resulting in higher operational and maintenance costs. 

Ingeteam’s robust firmware development methodology has been developed to minimise onsite validation and certification and has several key benefits:

• Enables the ability to track the desired functionality from specification to validation. 

• Allows for establishing requirements for various functionalities, including converter protections and emergency sequences, fieldbus communications, dynamic behaviour, power quality (PQ) response, fault ride-through (FRT) and dynamic response.

• Enables determination and defining of the proper validation environment for every stage of the development and functionality of the power converter, allowing for testing of functionality, from individual code debugging, to partial code software-in-the-loop (SiL) simulation, to full controller testing in hardware-in-the-loop (HiL) simulation. 

• Allows automation of test execution to ensure the validity of a solution upon multiple external conditions, such as grid variations and grid code fulfilment for example. 

Through this methodology process, any issues found during the validation stage are quickly fed back into the development stage to be corrected.

Firmware validation 

The firmware development is based on a procedure that is focused on the definition and successful execution of validation tests, with the ultimate aim of verifying and demonstrating the customer’s requirements are fully met. This step relies on the definition of the tests and on the platforms used during the validation process.

Test definition and execution

Firmware validation is a test-based approach, requiring the correct definition and tracking of the requirements and the test sequences. Replicability of test plans is essential for any accurate validation of new firmware releases, so must be automated where possible.

The first step involves the definition of the tests that will form the test plan, followed by the programming of the execution of the tests. For this purpose, Ingeteam has developed a web-based test automation tool to execute these tests.

Test cases are defined based on a database, containing test requirements, project-specific parameters and test acceptance values. An important part of this step is defining the target system, either SiL- or HiL-based, where each test will be executed.

The defined tests are then fed into the automation software, which executes the tests. Based on the target defined in the previous step, the correct system, based on either the SiL or HiL model, is launched. The targeted system must have a dedicated API available for this purpose.

After the test cases are executed, the results are processed to check that the acceptance values are met for each of the test cases, independently of the targeted system, and an acceptance report is generated, acknowledging the fulfilment of the performed test cases.

SiL validation 

SiL modelling is for the critical control software components and comprises detailed representation of the converter, generator, grid and control logics inside an EMT model, where the main control routines are compiled into an executable library (i.e.: .DLL) with the exact same source code that is deployed in the converter.

SiL modelling advantages include low-level debugging, flexible modelling independent of hardware limitations and multiple controller instances. Limitations are non-real-time execution, long simulation times, depending on model complexity, and partial coverage of original source code.

HiL validation 

To overcome the limitations of SiL validation, a real time simulation platform is included in Ingeteam’s validation procedure, which incorporates the real converter control unit (CCU).

The main benefit is that when using HiL modelling the firmware tested is exactly the same as the one released to production, running exactly in the same controller that is installed inside the converter.

HiL validation advantages include full coverage of converter firmware and of the controller’s hardware (digital and analogue I/Os, fieldbus communications, encoder signals, HMI interfaces) and real-time execution. 

Guaranteed reliability

For both SiL and HiL models to be trusted, the results of both models are always correlated to each other under the same test conditions, ensuring that the library component can be fully trusted when a HiL system is not available for controller integration.

Our validation process has been designed to ensure the highest levels of reliability of our wind turbine power converters.

Increasing complexity of converter controller firmware demands an accurate testing and validation process to guarantee a reliable firmware integration, prior to field deployment of the production code.

Ingeteam’s robust firmware development methodology ensures that the controller and the production code are fully tested throughout the development stages, minimising the on-site validation and certification phase, reducing time to market contributing to reduced levelised cost of energy.

• Click here to learn more about Ingeteam’s new Power Converters


Most Read

LM Wind Power cuts French blade production after 'technical incident'

EU launches probe into 'unfair' subsidies for Chinese wind turbine makers

Wind farm shut down again after blade breaks off Siemens Gamesa 4.X turbine

‘Coercion and discrimination’ – Chinese commerce body attacks EU probe

California fishing groups sue wind developers to delay marine surveys

Goldwind Americas appoints new CEO

Partner content

ERG's visionary approach: Repowering as the key to a more efficient tomorrow

Sparking a sustainable future: Global presence, local excellence

New offshore and onshore turbines to meet changes in global demand

Maximising efficiency: Winergy’s multibrand solutions

From deserts to deep seas: China’s trailblazing turbines

'World’s most powerful' onshore turbine enters the European market

From 21 days to 60 seconds: How to streamline your procurement process

How to reduce the carbon footprint of your wind farm… with steel

Free webinar: Minimising risk and repair costs with tailored blade inspection strategies

Expert report: Self perform or OEM-driven? The best model for turbine maintenance


JOIN, SHARE, LIKE, FOLLOW US ON:

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

Site Sections

  • Market Reports
  • Wind Industry Events
  • Windpower TV
  • Intelligence

Help & Information

  • About Windpower Monthly
  • About Windpower Intelligence
  • Contact Us
  • Advertiser Information
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Sitemap
  • Editorial Complaint?

Wind Industry Sectors

  • Business & Companies
  • Wind Power Technology
  • Policy & Markets
  • Project Development
  • Operations & Maintenance
  • Power Transmission
  • Offshore Wind Power
Haymarket © Haymarket Media Group Ltd. |
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Cookie Notice
  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookie Settings
IPSO regulated